Effect of an algorithm for automatic placing of standardised test order sets on low-value appointments and attendance rates at four Spanish teaching hospitals: an interrupted time series analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Reducing backlogs for elective care is a priority for healthcare systems. We conducted an interrupted time series analysis demonstrating the effect of an algorithm for placing automatic test order sets prior to first specialist appointment on avoidable follow-up appointments and attendance rates. DESIGN: Interrupted time series analysis. SETTING: 4 academic hospitals from Madrid, Spain. PARTICIPANTS: Patients referred from primary care attending 10 033 470 outpatient appointments from 16 clinical specialties during a 6-year period (1 January 2018 to 30 June 2023). INTERVENTION: An algorithm using natural language processing was launched in May 2021. Test order sets developed for 257 presenting complaints from 16 clinical specialties were placed automatically before first specialist appointments to increase rates of diagnosis and initiation of treatment with discharge back to primary care. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included rate of diagnosis and discharge to primary care and follow-up to first appointment index. The secondary outcome was trend in 'did not attend' rates. RESULTS: Since May 2021, a total of 1 175 814 automatic test orders have been placed. Significant changes in trend of diagnosis and discharge to primary care at first appointment (p=0.005, 95% CI 0.5 to 2.9) and 'did not attend' rates (p=0.006, 95% CI -0.1 to -0.8) and an estimated attributable reduction of 11 306 avoidable follow-up appointments per month were observed. CONCLUSION: An algorithm for placing automatic standardised test order sets can reduce low-value follow-up appointments by allowing specialists to confirm diagnoses and initiate treatment at first appointment, also leading to early discharge to primary care and a reduction in 'did not attend' rates. This initiative points to an improved process for outpatient diagnosis and treatment, delivering healthcare more effectively and efficiently.

Feasibility of Telemedicine in the Management Strategy of Patients With Lymphoma Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic in Spain: Prospective Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: On March 14, 2020, a state of alarm was declared in Spain due to the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Beyond this date, COVID-19 in the country changed the practice of oncologic care. OBJECTIVE: Since recurrent hospital visits were a potential risk factor for contagion, the aim of this prospective observational study was to analyze the consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in the health care of patients with lymphoma. METHODS: All data were obtained from the electronic medical record. Variables such as age, sex, reason of the visit, use of the patient portal, changes in management, enrollment in clinical trials, and COVID-19 infection were recorded. RESULTS: In all, 290 patients visited the lymphoma clinic, totaling 437 appointments. The median age was 66 (range 18-94) years, and 157 (54.1%) patients were male. Of them, 214 (73.8%) patients had only 1 visit to the clinic. Only 23 (7.9%) patients did not have access to the patient portal. Amid the COVID-19 pandemic, 78 (26.9%) patients remained in active treatment, 35 (12.1%) experienced delays in their treatments, and 6 (2.1%) experienced treatment discontinuation. During the follow-up, only 7 (2.4%) patients had a COVID-19 infection (6 cases with confirmed polymerase chain reaction test and 1 case with clinical suspicion). Despite the implementation of telemedicine strategies to avoid visits to the hospital, 66 (22.8%) patients had in-person visits at the lymphoma clinic. Patients who attended in-person consultations were younger than those who preferred telemedicine consultations (62 vs 66 years; P=.10) and had less use of the patient portal (17/224, 7.6% vs 6/66, 9%; P=.10), although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Patients who attended in-person visits were more likely to have had only 1 visit to the hospital (29/66, 43.9% vs 185/224, 82.6%; P<.001). Regarding the reason of in-person consultations, more patients were on active treatment in comparison to those using telemedicine resources (37/66, 56.1% vs 42/224, 18.3%; P<.001). Patients with a preference for telemedicine strategies had more surveillance visits (147/224, 65.6% vs 24/66, 36.4%; P<.001). Regarding treatment modifications, more treatment delays (29/224, 12.9% vs 6/66, 9.1%; P=.10) and more definite treatment discontinuations (6/224, 2.7% vs 0/66, 0%; P=.10) were seen in patients using telemedicine resources when compared to patients attending in-person visits, although these differences did not reach statistical significance. Regarding the type of therapy, patients attending in-person visits were more likely to receive an intravenous treatment rather than those using telemedicine (23/66, 62.2% vs 17/224, 40.5%; P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine such as patient portals are feasible strategies in the management of patients with lymphoma during the COVID-19 pandemic, with a reduction of in-person visits to the hospital and a very low contagion rate.

Point of care ultrasound knowledge among resident doctors in Madrid's university hospitals. Influence of the induction in emergency departments with point of care ultrasound practice / Grado de conocimiento de la ecografía a pie de cama, entre una muestra de médicos residentes de hospitales universitarios de Madrid. Influencia de la inducción en los servicios de urgencias con uso habitual de ecografía a pie de cama

BACKGROUND: Point of care ultrasound study (POCUS) is a relatively new technique in Spanish Emergency Departments (EDs). Nonetheless, its use is increasing, and the number of emergency doctors and the number of papers published in our country has skyrocketed in last decade. Despite this fact, there is still no evidence of how POCUS is taught in our medical schools. OBJECTIVE: To ascertain the level of knowledge about POCUS in first year resident doctors of three hospitals in Madrid, and one year after having worked in ED with POCUS practice. METHODS AND STUDY DESIGN: The study looked at demographic aspects, POCUS knowledge, and opinions about its usefulness in the ED, prior to and after working in ED with routine use of POCUS. RESULTS: Of the 265 questionnaires, 197 were first-year residents (Group 1) and 68 second-year residents (Group 2). Another 55 senior medical students completed the questionnaire (Group 3). The majority of Groups 1 and 3 stated to have a very low POCUS level. Almost three-quarters (73%) of Group 2 stated having an intermediate or high level, and 26% even declared having full knowledge. More than half of the students agreed that POCUS was a useful tool in ED. CONCLUSIONS: There is a low level of knowledge about POCUS among first-year residents. After working in POCUS qualified EDs, these resident doctors state both the importance and their higher level of knowledge of POCUS

INTRODUCCIÓN: La ecografía a pie de cama (EPC) es una técnica diagnóstica cada día más utilizada por los médicos urgenciólogos en los servicios de urgencias hospitalarios españoles. No obstante, desconocemos el nivel de la EPC de nuestros médicos residentes de primer año (R1). OBJETIVO: Determinar el nivel de conocimientos sobre la EPC de los R1, en 3 hospitales universitarios de Madrid, y el conocimiento un año después de haber trabajado en servicios de urgencias con utilización habitual de la EPC. MÉTODOS: Nuestra encuesta investigaba datos demográficos, nivel previo de conocimiento de la EPC y opinión acerca de su utilidad en el servicio de urgencias. También se aplicó la encuesta a 55 estudiantes de medicina del último curso (EM6). RESULTADOS: De 265 encuestas: 197 fueron de R1 y 68 de R2. También se pasó la encuesta a otros 55 estudiantes de medicina del último curso (EM6). La mayoría de los R1 y EM6, revelaron un nivel previo muy bajo de conocimientos de la EPC. En cambio, el 73% de los R2, manifestaron un nivel intermedio o alto, e incluso un 26% declararon un conocimiento amplio. Más de la mitad de los encuestados manifestó estar de acuerdo en que la EPC era una herramienta muy útil en el servicio de urgencias. CONCLUSIONES: Existe un bajo nivel de conocimientos sobre la EPC entre los R1. Después de haber trabajado en servicios de urgencias con práctica habitual de EPC, estos mismos médicos residentes, reconocieron tanto la importancia de la EPC como su alto nivel de conocimientos de la EPC

Sonographic Assessment of the Effects of Mechanical Ventilation on Carotid Flow Time and Volume.

Background Corrected carotid flow time (CFTc) and carotid blood flow (CBF) are sonographic measurements used to assess fluid responsiveness in hypotension. We investigated the impacts of mechanical ventilation on CFTc and CBF. Materials and methods Normotensive patients undergoing cardiac surgery were prospectively enrolled. Carotid ultrasound (US) was performed pre and post-intubation. Post-intubation measurements took place after the initiation of mechanical ventilation. To measure CFTc and CBF, a sagittal carotid view was obtained with pulse wave-Doppler (maximum angle 60°). CFTc was calculated with the Bazett formula (CFTc = systolic time/√cycle time). CBF was calculated using CBF (mL/min) = area (cm 2 ) x time average mean velocity (TAMEAN) (cm/sec) x 60 (sec/min). The maximum carotid diameter was measured at the level of the thyroid. Results Twenty patients were enrolled. Mean CFTc pre-intubation was 328 ms (SD 43.9 ms) compared to CFTc post-intubation 336 ms (SD 36 ms). There was no significant difference between pre and post-intubation CFTc (mean differences=-0.008; t(19)=-0.71, p=.49). Mean CBF pre-intubation was 487 mL/min (SD 176 mL/min) compared to CBF post-intubation 447 mL/min (SD 187 mL/min). There was no significant difference between pre and post-intubation CBF (mean differences= 40; t(19)=1.24, p=.23). Conclusions In this study of normotensive patients, there were no detected differences in CFTc or CBF pre and post-intubation with mechanical ventilation.

La encuesta retrospectiva en contraposición con la opinión puntual: ¿cuál es la mejor forma de obtener feedback de nuestros residentes al valorar la actividad en urgencias? / The retrospective survey as opposed to the immediate opinion: What is the best way to receive feedback from our residents about their activity in emergency wards?

INTRODUCCIÓN: La recopilación de información a partir del usuario sobre un servicio o producto es esencial para la mejora del mismo. En medicina de urgencias, la pedagogía y supervisión no están sujetas a normativas homogéneas habituales en especialidades reconocidas y por lo tanto, con frecuencia, requieren modificaciones. Nos planteamos, cuál es el mejor método de recopilar la opinión de nuestros residentes: la encuesta retrospectiva anual, utilizada en la actualidad, o la recolección de información inmediatamente después de una guardia, atendiendo a una extrapolación de las técnicas de generación de índices de satisfacción del consumidor. MÉTODO: Encuestamos a 75 residentes de 4 hospitales distintos preguntando por su grado de acuerdo con 5 enunciados sobre sus guardias, tanto de forma retrospectiva anual como con respecto a la última guardia. Añadimos una pregunta control sobre la comida proveída por la correspondiente cafetería del hospital. RESULTADOS: En todas las dimensiones encuestadas, los residentes fueron mucho más críticos cuando hicieron valoraciones retrospectivas que cuando opinaron sobre su guardia más reciente. Al repetir la encuesta en 35 residentes, preguntando por otra guardia de forma puntual, los porcentajes de acuerdo se mantuvieron similares. CONCLUSIÓN: Nuestros resultados indican que, con el propósito de recoger información sobre supervisión y actividad asistencial en urgencias, la técnica de encuestas retrospectivas tiende a infravalorar la opinión real de los residentes. Estas observaciones coinciden con las recomendaciones universales sobre índices de satisfacción del consumidor y estrategias de corrección de los sesgos de memoria

INTRODUCTION: Our aim is to determine which way to gather feedback form our residents Is better: an annual retrospective survey which is used nowadays, or to collect information immediately after an emergency ward, given the knowledge gained from the technics of development of customer satisfaction. METHOD: A survey was carried out on 75 residents from four different hospitals asking about their level of agreement with five statements related to their emergency wards, both retrospectively during the previous year and their last on-call session. A control question was also including asking their opinion about the meals provided by the hospital dining service. RESULTS: In all the dimensions of the questionnaire, residents were much more critical when they made yearly retrospective assessments than when they asked about their last emergency on-call session. When the survey was repeated among 35 residents asking about another last emergency on-call session, the results remained similar. CONCLUSION: Our results show that a retrospective survey tends to underestimate the real opinion of residents about their experience during emergency sessions. This observation is coincident with the universal recommendations on user satisfaction index and strategies to avoid memory bias

Modelo Point-of-Care Ultrasound en Atención Primaria: ¿herramienta de alta resolución? / Point of Care Ultrasound in Primary Care. Is it a high resolution tool?

El modelo "Point of Care Ultrasound" es una forma de hacer ecografía clínica rápida con un fin: responder a una cuestión clínica de forma inmediata. No es hacer ecografía de modo sistemático como la que hacen los radiólogos, ni pretende sustituirla. Es útil en alguna forma de cribado (aneurisma de aorta abdominal) y es de especial interés en procedimientos ecoguiados (infiltraciones articulares). Permite adecuar las derivaciones, minimizando la incertidumbre y descartando determinadas enfermedades por su elevada precisión diagnóstica. Pero puede llevarnos al sobrediágnostico si las exploraciones que realizamos son no limitadas a los órganos sobre los que está fundamentada nuestra sospecha clínica. La ecografía es una herramienta más del proceso diagnóstico, pero que debe ser limitada en su utilización a determinadas situaciones clínicas. Su uso en la detección precoz de enfermedades prevalentes en Atención Primaria deberá ser convenientemente evaluado. Y, por otra parte, con gran evidencia de alta precisión diagnóstica en un gran elenco de entidades patológicas

Point-of-Care Ultrasound is a method of performing a rapid clinical ultrasound, with the aim of responding to a clinical question immediately. This is not an ultrasound performed systematically as the radiologists do, nor does it pretend to replace it. It is useful in some kind of screening (abdominal aortic aneurysm) and is of special interest in ultrasound-guided procedures (joint infiltration by injection). It allows to adapt the derivations, minimising the uncertainty, ruling out certain pathologies due to its high diagnostic precision. It can also lead to overdiagnosis, if the examinations carried out are not limited to the organs on which our clinical suspicion is based.Ultrasound is one tool more in the diagnostic process, but its use must be limited to certain clinical situations. Its use in early detection of prevalent diseases in Primary Care should be properly evaluated. On the other hand with more evidence of a high diagnostic accuracy in a large list of pathological conditions

[Point of Care Ultrasound in Primary Care. Is it a high resolution tool?] / Modelo Point-of-Care Ultrasound en Atención Primaria: ¿herramienta de alta resolución?

Point-of-Care Ultrasound is a method of performing a rapid clinical ultrasound, with the aim of responding to a clinical question immediately. This is not an ultrasound performed systematically as the radiologists do, nor does it pretend to replace it. It is useful in some kind of screening (abdominal aortic aneurysm) and is of special interest in ultrasound-guided procedures (joint infiltration by injection). It allows to adapt the derivations, minimising the uncertainty, ruling out certain pathologies due to its high diagnostic precision. It can also lead to overdiagnosis, if the examinations carried out are not limited to the organs on which our clinical suspicion is based. Ultrasound is one tool more in the diagnostic process, but its use must be limited to certain clinical situations. Its use in early detection of prevalent diseases in Primary Care should be properly evaluated. On the other hand with more evidence of a high diagnostic accuracy in a large list of pathological conditions.